Cultist Fanatic "Starsky" Fans Mess Up My Website

When we refer to "Starsky" we do not mean Ben Stiller fans. We'd like to make that crystal clear from the start because Ben Stiller naturally may have younger fans -- but then again, we've recently realized that younger DOES NOT mean "making more sense".

We're talking about fans of Paul Michael Glaser, who is basically a good person. Glaser, is almost 68, and is trying to complete a book. Mind you, his writing is great -- his "fanatic" fans aren't. They're as perilous as those Islamic terrorists who protest too much (understatement) and "get personal" enoughto ruin another person's website. The webmaster isn't too keen in keeping order either... yet, her mantra is "love.. love.. love" and a lot of Zen-like talk that to my mind I doubt if she even comprehends. There I was reading to a really great blog that wasn't too LONGGGGG, and I read comments from the psychic life of ones cat to a lecture on Oriental theology (and I am Asian).

Anyway Glaser is into something like zen and sometimes shares his ideas on his blogs. Glaser makes it VERY clear that "he's not saying he's right or wrong... that we all have our truth and that we should figure out and discover ourselves "any way we want. He does add however that we can do this only through embracing our fear and loving everyone.. or trying to do so anyway. In short, his message is simple, some of his fan commentators make it  complex.

Then, it started when during one those rare occurrences, he was in a mood to write and share a bog entry called HOME. Basically, he meant that "home" really means where one's heart is most comfy with. There were a few who disagreed, and that set the majority of "extremist fans" against those who contradiction Glaser's short philosophy (if we may call it that). This contant bickering continued until I dared say that there is no difference between Joan of Arc and the author of something like the book "Conversation with God". Do you THINK I was given the RIGHT to debate my point? NO. Instead I was curtly told by a Glaser fanatic to "drop it". Heck, even those who couldn't UNDERSTAND English could comment as long as it was a LOVING message without making any sense which defeated the essence of Glaser's effort. After all, he made it crystal clear his blog are his thoughts not his fan site.

Then I got juicy emails about and from the webmaster. I felt that it was RIGHT to tell her that she was working and servicing really "loving" people (as Brutus is an honorable man.. yah get it?) . I GOT an email from another member of Glaser's "crazy fandom" telling me that the webmaster felt it was alright to kick her arse.. or something to that effect. Wow, was I impressed, I thought she was REALLY into love. No kidding.I wanted to offer her real estate in the San Andes fault because I figured she was either a mosochist, a Barry Manilow fan or into self-flagellation.When I called someone 'innocent', it was misconstrued.

That was until I received another email telling me that "our orientations were different" -- and I couldn't even comprehend what she meant by "orientation". Another friend of mine wondered if the whole "mantra group" was a fan cult and boldly posted the question -- no one dared reply.It was so WEIRD. I am wary of anything claimed by Hollywood to be spiritual -- be it "Scientology" to "alien abduction" and I say so. My networking blog was LITERALLY attacked by fan fanatics and was told something like this by one person who is in love with her cat (not men), another who says that she studies apes at Emory University and the webmaster who loves everyone and wants to say "LOVE" too often that it was boring. I was told to go elsewhere IN MY OWN SITE and someone wrote on my site these words:

"Also yes I am a devoted fan of Paul michael Glaser. So what? If you guys can't accept that then that's your problem not mine. I am actually loyal to my friends my real friends that is. Go play some where else."

We couldn't play somewhere else because they were referring to MY blog -- not the blog of Paul Glaser or the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Thus, I had to remind her that she had NO RIGHT to evict people from MY PERSONAL BLOG.

Some fans invaded my blog, talked really dirty to my friends... and all because she felt I "disrespected" her idol when i added that Paul Glaser wasn't "God". Yet Mr. Glaser's fanatic fans feel that it is alright to insult Mohammed, Jesus, the Pope and any organized religion.I am NOT upset about that. I never liked organized religion because it reminded me of the Crusades and the SPANISH Inquisition.

But imagine the cyber-violence done to my site? Talking about fruitcakes(and rather mature ones, mostly women) I cannnot help but feel anything but sympathy for the sad plight of Paul Glaser who at 68, has to endure the madness of "fandom". It made me wonder what this mortal (never claimed he was God) ever did in his previous life (if he had one) to deserve the warped affection of the oddest people in the planet. 

Another thing really stange about this bunch of cookoos is that they seem NOT to want to hear about God.Instead, they refer to "the universe", "oneness","is-ness" and a lot of eerie linggo. It makes relatively normal people wonder how these people get through their day -- probably talking to themselves or walls?

Or perhaps, their "religion" called "oddness" .makes them prone to cyber-violence.

It makes me MISS Jesus Christ so bad. REALLY. I fact, now I probably love Jesus more -- because, He did make a LOT of more sense than talking to the walls or incessantly thinking about what I'm thinking (see how complicated and weird it sounds?) Most of all, I feel NOTHING but pity for Paul Michael Glaser who definitely is well intentioned.